sick of all this…
lackluster, synth-dependent, 80s-wannabe, faux-hipster bullshit. It sounds like elevator music on MDMA. Without the hook. No gracias.
Small pop-culture/political rant from the mouth of a Canadian
You know what really grinds my gears?
Kim fucking Kardashian’s divorce.
May I begin by first posing this question: who gives an actual fuck?
No, really. Because it is front page fucking news and you know what? It MARVELS me at how you do it, America. Really, it blows my fucking mind. How do you, again and again, try and tell your people that gay relationships are ruining the sanctity of marriage when you have a woman who gives little to our culture other than a nice, full ass and head full of luscious, dark hair, that literally made a profit off of a marriage that lasted less than 3 months. 72 days, actually. And it’s all anyone can talk about!
Oh, what a goddamn catastrophe that YET ANOTHER HETEROSEXUAL MARRIAGE HAS ENDED IN TOTAL AND COMPLETE FAILURE. Meanwhile, there are hundreds of thousands of same-sex couples across the US that have been together for decades and they are denied the right to legally marry simply because of…what, exactly? Because they love each other too much? Because they don’t live for the next big headline? Because Perez Hilton doesn’t know who they are? Or because the legal representatives in their state are too narrow-minded, anti-progressive, homophobic and down right unconstituional???
It boggles my mind.
Maybe I am out of place passing such ardent judgement on a country in which I do not live but, l mean, c’mon. I have a good point.
/end rant
The Killers - Mr. Brightside
The Killers - Mr Brightside
Okay, can we just talk about this song for one second? I was discussing this with a friend the other day…I am so annoyed how much radio play this song got back in 2006. It is so fucking great, and the radio killed it. I hate mainstream radio. YOU HEAR ME, RADIO? I hate chyou.
(Source: lauuuuuuuuuuuuren)
Taylor Lautner, our favourite Barely Legal Hottie, graces the cover of GQ next month.
One comment found on the GQ website:
“GQ used to be a semi-decent MENS magazine, so why in the world do you have to put these BOYS on your front cover that your readership doesn’t care about? Come on guys, stop dumbing down your magazine already.”
Why do they put these “boys” on the cover? Because GQ knows better than you, dear commentor, who their “readership” is. GQ is no longer a men-only magazine. Women fucking love this magazine. As a woman myself, who buys this magazine, I can safely make that conclusion. Most women have grown excessively tired of the content of magazines aimed at us. Though we may love Vanity Fair (which is also popular amongst men), or Vogue (and, I hate to admit it, Cosmo), we also love GQ because it’s sexy, it’s masculine, and there is a shit ton of CK underwear ads in it.
GQ, being the savvy magazine that it is, realizes that although they need to know what men want, they also need to know what women want too. No point in alienating a very prized market. It’s really quite genius.
So, why Taylor Lautner? In a few words: because he makes us feel young, and a little bit dirty. Is that so wrong?
